<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forests: Carbon Sink or Carbon Bomb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Peloso</title>
		<link>http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-27203</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Peloso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/#comment-27203</guid>
		<description>Rex,

I would like to plant some trees to further my personal efforts to halt global warming.  This article says that it may only be a relevant thing to do in the tropics, while in the more temperate areas it can increase the process.

https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2006/NR-06-12-02.html

Any recommendations?

Rex Weyler: This article is referring to the albedo effect, the reflective qualities of snow-covered land versus darker forests cover. This is, indeed, a counter-impact of forests. Nevertheless, planting trees anywhere, anytime, is a positive act. Trees absorb carbon. The best place to plant trees for this effect is in regions that once had trees that were removed. So replanting clear-cuts or urban areas is always a net benefit. It is true that as the climate warms and forest move both farther into north and south latitudes, the darker forest cover will absorb more heat than the snow-cover. But you don&#039;t need to worry about this in regard to planting trees. Plant as many as you can. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex,</p>
<p>I would like to plant some trees to further my personal efforts to halt global warming.  This article says that it may only be a relevant thing to do in the tropics, while in the more temperate areas it can increase the process.</p>
<p><a href="https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2006/NR-06-12-02.html" rel="nofollow">https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2006/NR-06-12-02.html</a></p>
<p>Any recommendations?</p>
<p>Rex Weyler: This article is referring to the albedo effect, the reflective qualities of snow-covered land versus darker forests cover. This is, indeed, a counter-impact of forests. Nevertheless, planting trees anywhere, anytime, is a positive act. Trees absorb carbon. The best place to plant trees for this effect is in regions that once had trees that were removed. So replanting clear-cuts or urban areas is always a net benefit. It is true that as the climate warms and forest move both farther into north and south latitudes, the darker forest cover will absorb more heat than the snow-cover. But you don&#8217;t need to worry about this in regard to planting trees. Plant as many as you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Idi</title>
		<link>http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-18132</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Idi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/#comment-18132</guid>
		<description>I think it should be against the law to cut down a tree... people should have free birth control assistance, and we should have laws to enforce near zero waste recycling.  
  But as long as the big wigs at the top stay in control, things will never change. Perhaps chaos will have to descend first... and knock over the big cats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should be against the law to cut down a tree&#8230; people should have free birth control assistance, and we should have laws to enforce near zero waste recycling.<br />
  But as long as the big wigs at the top stay in control, things will never change. Perhaps chaos will have to descend first&#8230; and knock over the big cats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Peloso</title>
		<link>http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Peloso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rexweyler.com/2009/04/14/forests-carbon-sink-or-carbon-bomb/#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>These new findings give some clarity for environmentalists on how to structure activism.  Tackle climate, and stop counting on forests to slow change.  Like the planet, they too have limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These new findings give some clarity for environmentalists on how to structure activism.  Tackle climate, and stop counting on forests to slow change.  Like the planet, they too have limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
