The VERIFY staff took on among the commonest claims made by individuals rallying across the ‘cease the steal’ slogan nationwide this weekend.
Rallies are being organized throughout the U.S. round a slogan that insinuates this yr’s presidential election was rife with fraud. The slogan is “cease the steal.”
The teams imagine the election is being stolen from President Donald Trump by technique of election fraud. Nonetheless, there isn’t proof to those claims.
Right here’s a breakdown of a few of their extra frequent claims.
RELATED: VERIFY: Reality-checking election claims and rumors
CLAIM: Widespread fraud swung the election away from President Trump and towards President-elect Biden
That is the broadest of the claims being made. There isn’t any proof to recommend this regardless of ongoing makes an attempt to show it.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company, a federal company with Division of Homeland Safety oversight created in the course of the Trump administration, launched a press release on Wednesday that mentioned, “The November third election was probably the most safe in American historical past.”
They added, “When states have shut elections, many will recount ballots. The entire states with shut leads to the 2020 presidential race have paper information of every vote, permitting the power to return and rely every poll if vital. That is an additional advantage for safety and resilience. This course of permits for the identification and correction of any errors or errors. There isn’t any proof that any voting system deleted or misplaced votes, modified votes, or was in any method compromised.”
In addition they have a web page the place they’ve fact-checked most of the claims of fraud made already.
Voter fraud is a federal crime. The Justice Division has made no bulletins of any discoveries, arrests or convictions of voter fraud as of but and neither has the FBI.
CLAIM: Election-swinging numbers of useless individuals voted
As soon as once more, there’s no proof to again up these claims. A lot of the supposed proof truly displays errors and quirks in voting rolls that don’t truly show a vote solid beneath a useless individual’s title was counted.
The Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures explains states are required by regulation to frequently take away deceased individuals from voter rolls when they’re found, and plenty of states have techniques in place to assist determine and purge such individuals from the rolls.
The Michigan Division of State launched a fact-check addressing normal claims of mass dead-person votes in Michigan. They defined that varied errors within the registered voter system could make it appear as if a useless individual voted when the vote was truly solid by a residing individual with an analogous title or by an individual whose birthday is incorrectly displayed. They added that, within the off probability somebody does attempt to vote beneath a useless individual’s identification, there are safeguards in place to stop the vote from being counted.
CISA included this declare on their rumor management webpage. They defined most of the identical issues talked about above and added, “further election integrity safeguards, together with signature matching and knowledge checks, additional defend towards voter impersonation and voting by ineligible individuals.”
RELATED: VERIFY: No proof of widespread circumstances of useless individuals voting
CLAIM: Dominion voting machine glitch altered vote tallies
This declare was amplified when Republican Nationwide Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel mentioned in a press convention, “there was a serious software program challenge in Antrim County [in Michigan] that we’ve issues might have had issues in different counties as properly.”
Nonetheless, the Michigan Division of State mentioned these claims “haven’t any advantage.”
The Division of State mentioned, “The inaccurate reporting of unofficial outcomes from Antrim county was a results of unintentional error on the a part of the Antrim County Clerk. The tools and software program didn’t malfunction and all ballots have been correctly tabulated. Nonetheless, the clerk by accident didn’t replace the software program used to gather voting machine information and report unofficial outcomes.”
They mentioned the difficulty was corrected. “The software program didn’t trigger a misallocation of votes; it was a results of person human error. Even when human error happens, it’s caught throughout county canvasses.”
RELATED: VERIFY: Software program glitch didn’t swap votes to Biden, Michigan officers say
Later, a brand new declare shared by the president himself emerged. It alleged that the identical firm accountable for the Michigan voting machines, Dominion, was accountable for 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide being deleted.
These making the declare say the information comes from Edison Analysis. However Edison Analysis’s president mentioned in an electronic mail to VERIFY it by no means created any report or printed any information that might have led to this declare.
The Wednesday press launch from CISA particularly addressed this declare. It mentioned, “There isn’t any proof that any voting system deleted or misplaced votes, modified votes, or was in any method compromised.”
RELATED: VERIFY: No proof voting machines deleted thousands and thousands of Trump votes
CLAIM: Some states have extra votes than registered voters, others have unusually excessive turnout
Various claims have tried to argue that there are extra votes than registered voters in some key battleground states whereas different key battlegrounds have turnout unusually excessive above common.
We broke down the variety of presently casted vote totals with the variety of registered voters in eight states topic to those claims and located votes surpassed voters in not one of the listed states. You’ll be able to see the breakdown — with hyperlinks to the states’ voter registration statistics — on this spreadsheet.
A number of of those states permit for voters to register to vote on the polls on Election Day. These states, marked with inexperienced on the spreadsheet, have not up to date their voter registration numbers following Election Day as of but, that means their voter registration totals are already outdated.
A few of these states could disregard whole registered voters when calculating turnout as a result of they permit voters to register whereas voting. In Wisconsin, the place individuals claimed turnout was unusually excessive, the Wisconsin Elections Fee says it “calculates voter turnout as a share of the voting-age inhabitants.” The turnout this yr is not exceedingly better than in previous years when utilizing their components.
RELATED: VERIFY: No, Wisconsin’s 2020 turnout shouldn’t be the best by an enormous margin
RELATED: VERIFY: No, Wisconsin didn’t report extra votes than people who find themselves registered to vote
One thing you’d like VERIFIED? Click on right here to submit your story.