General News

Subway tuna sandwich lacks ‘any trace of tuna,’ lawsuit claims

81c4565f 42fe 4bb4 8d27 223945a440bf 1140x641

A lawsuit claims Subway’s tuna sandwiches ‘lack any hint of tuna as a part.’ The quick meals chain says the allegations will not be true.

Subway is pushing again towards a lawsuit that claims the quick meals chain would not use actual tuna in its sandwiches and wraps.

The lawsuit, from two California residents, claims Subway’s tuna is “constructed from a combination of assorted concoctions that don’t represent tuna, but have been blended collectively.” It additionally accuses the chain of fraud and misrepresentation. 

Subway denies this and in response stated the tuna it serves is “100% Wild-Caught Tuna.”

“There merely is not any fact to the allegations within the criticism that was filed in California,” a Subway spokesperson stated in an announcement. “The style and high quality of our tuna make it considered one of Subway’s hottest merchandise and these baseless accusations threaten to wreck our franchisees, small enterprise homeowners who work tirelessly to uphold the excessive requirements that Subway units for all of its merchandise, together with its tuna.”

The California lawsuit cited “unbiased testing” and claimed the merchandise “solely lack any hint of tuna as a part.” Nonetheless, the lawsuit didn’t clarify what that testing entailed or what elements they allegedly discovered as a substitute. 

Shalini Dogra, an legal professional representing the residents who introduced the lawsuit, advised the Washington Submit that they “discovered that the elements weren’t tuna and never fish.” Nonetheless, Dogra wouldn’t inform the Submit what the lab had supposedly recognized because the tuna elements.

Subway stated it plans to battle the claims, which a spokesperson described as “frivolous” and “being pursued with out satisfactory investigation.” 

See also  Mass Effect Characters Not Worth Trying To Save

This is not the primary time {that a} lawsuit raised quiestions about Subway’s meals. Final 12 months, Eire’s Supreme Court docket dominated that bread bought by the quick meals chain contained a lot sugar that it couldn’t be legally outlined as bread in Eire. 

RELATED: Atlantic Metropolis auctions spot to push demolish button on Trump on line casino

RELATED: Irish courtroom guidelines Subway sandwiches too sugary to legally be referred to as bread

RELATED: three accused of making ‘man cave’ beneath NYC Grand Central station

Supply hyperlink

About the author


Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published.